Cases 71 - 80 of 200
Curtis v. Wright Medical Group N.V. et al
as 1:2020cv00509
Defendant:
J. Patrick Mackin, Stryker Corporation, David D. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Curtis
Aaron Bressi v. Tracy McCloud, et al
as 20-1758
Defendant:
JOHN GEMBIC, JEFFREY LEACH, KIMBERLY SEDDON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
Stein v. Wright Medical Group N.V. et al
as 1:2020cv00582
Defendant:
J. Patrick Mackin, Stryker Corporation, David D. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Orlando Stanford v. John Walton, et al
as 20-1368
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE LOWTHER, Lieutenant, ERIC SCHWARTZ, Deputy Warden of Treatment, DAWN BICKERTON, Physician Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORLANDO STANFORD
Woodward v. Wright Medical Group N.V. et al
as 1:2020cv00494
Defendant:
J. Patrick Mackin, David D. Stevens, Robert J. Palmisano and others
Plaintiff:
Gracie Woodward
Chalmers Simpson, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 20-1331
Defendant / Appellee:
PAROLE AGENT AMY BURRELL, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PAROLE AGENT MATT SHEAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON, JR.
Aaron Bressi v. Tracy McCloud, et al
as 20-1077
Defendant:
JOHN GEMBIC, JEFFREY LEACH, KIMBERLY SEDDON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC. v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv21291
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF THE EAST ORANGE CITY COUNCIL: MUSTAFA A. BRENT, MEMBERS OF THE EAST ORANGE CITY COUNCIL: TAMEIKA GARRETT WARD, MEMBERS OF THE EAST ORANGE CITY COUNCIL: QUILLA E. TALMADGE and others
Plaintiff:
EXTENET SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 251
Aaron Bressi v. Tracy McCloud, et al
as 19-3894
Defendant / Appellee:
DEGG STARK, CHASTITY SEDDON, TERRY KECHEM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON J. BRESSI
Defendant:
PATROLMAN ADAMS, PATROLMAN EDWARD GRECO, PATROLMAN JEFFREY LONG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
