Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
COOTWARE v. AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv60008
Plaintiff:
JAMIE COOTWARE
Defendant:
AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION , AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. , BORG-WARNER INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY and MOTION INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY , AMERICAN CRANE AND EQUIPMENT CORPORATION , AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 12-3082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN STAFFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL INC, BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC and others
Garnishee - Appellee:
BUFFALO PUMPS INC
MCNAIR v. BORG-WARNER, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv60160
Plaintiff:
MARY C. MCNAIR
Defendant:
BORG-WARNER, INC. , BRAKE SUPPLY COMPANY INC., CBS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
BORG-WARNER, INC.
Cross_defendant:
BORG-WARNER, INC. , BRAKE SUPPLY COMPANY INC., CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEHLKE v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60049
Plaintiff:
LUELLA C. PEHLKE
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION , A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , BORG-WARNER, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. and BORG-WARNER, INC.
Cross_defendant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , BORG-WARNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIANCHI v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60035
Plaintiff:
DORIS J BIANCHI
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIRGAS MERCHANT GASES LLC, BECHTEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JURGLANIS v. BORG-WARNER INC et al
as 2:2012cv60003
Plaintiff:
MARIE H JURGLANIS
Defendant:
BORG-WARNER INC , CBS CORPORATION , DOSSERT CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
FOSECO INC.
Cross_defendant:
FOSECO INC. , BORG-WARNER INC , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZELLNER v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv66746
Plaintiff:
CAROL J ZELLNER
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , ALBANY FELT COMPANY INC., BORG-WARNER INC and others
Cross_claimant:
BRANDON DRYING FABRICS INC.
Cross_defendant:
BRANDON DRYING FABRICS INC. , ALBANY FELT COMPANY INC., AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROWN v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv64240
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. BROWN
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , ALBANY FELT COMPANY, INC., ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
WARREN PUMPS and THE ORR FELT COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
WARREN PUMPS , A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALBANY FELT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
