Cases 11 - 19 of 19
DANIELSON v. CHESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2013cv05427
Plaintiff:
HAROLD F. DANIELSON
Defendant:
CHESTER TOWNSHIP, HIGHLANDS WATER PROTECTION AND PLANNING COUNCIL , BRUCE JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRIFFIN v. CITY OF BAYONNE et al
as 2:2012cv07912
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
CITY OF BAYONNE , BAYONNE POLICE DEPARTMENT , GEORGE PONIK and others
Counter_claimant:
DANIEL KAISER , CITY OF BAYONNE , CHESTER KONOPKA and others
Counter_defendant:
JEFFREY GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MA'AT: EL-BEY v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv04483
Plaintiff:
CHESTER-RAY: MA'AT: EL-BEY
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCANLON, BURGESS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CHESTER - RAY: MA'AT: EL-BEY et al v. EAST BRUNSWICK MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 3:2012cv03797
Plaintiff:
CHESTER - RAY: MA'AT: EL-BEY and MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA MIR NO 4TH & 5TH GENERATION INC
Defendant:
EAST BRUNSWICK MUNICIPAL COURT, JUDGE: CHRISTINE M. HEITMANN, PROSECUTOR: TIM ARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
WILLIAMS v. CHESTER et al
as 3:2010cv01980
Plaintiff:
GARY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CHESTER and J. MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONLOW et al v. GARFIELD PARK ACADEMY et al
as 3:2009cv06248
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE DONLOW and MELLISSA BROOKS DONLOW
Defendant:
GARFIELD PARK ACADEMY, STEVEN MORSE, GLADYS MORSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv03462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
