Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Sawicki v. Kipphan et al
as 1:2021cv02031
Plaintiff:
Marianne Sawicki
Defendant:
Michael M. Kipphan, Lori Heaton, Richard A. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Assurant Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01270
Defendant:
King & Spalding LLP, Roye Cooper Cohen Braunfeld LLC, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WILLIAMS et al v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN
as 3:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. WILLIAMS and DONNA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Milburn v. City of York et al
as 1:2012cv00121
Plaintiff:
Donte Milburn
Defendant:
City of York , Michael S. Hose , Richard S. Peddicord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akhi Muhammad v. Gregory Weis, et al
as 11-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHI R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY T. WEIS, W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
DASILVA v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY GLOUCESTER COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv04353
Plaintiff:
DIOGENES R. DASILVA
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY GLOUCESTER COUNTY and HONORABLE JUDGE RICHARD S. HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LANG et al v. TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
NILES LANG and SONJA KEITH
Defendant:
TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP , TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP ENGINEER , CHARLES ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Schmidt v. James Creedon, et al
as 10-1633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL C. SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES P. CREEDON, CONNIE A. TENNIS, RICHARD S. SHAFFER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
