Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 89, Local 4013 et al
as 1:2019cv00536
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 89, Local 4013, Frederick S. Withum, III, Steve Mullen and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis W. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Poplin
as 1:2018cv01846
Defendant:
Joshua Poplin
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Thompson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Thompson v. Poplin et al
as 1:2018cv01488
Defendant:
Joshua Poplin, C. Taylor Katherman, David W. Sunday, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Thompson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Woosley v. US District Court Connecticut, et al
as 16-3584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL DAVID WOOSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT and ALVIN W. THOMPSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendant:
DAVID H. SMITH and KIMBERLY A SMITH
WOOSLEY v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 2:2015cv04778
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. WOOSLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT , ALVIN W. THOMPSON , DAVID H. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimi Rose v. County of York, et al
as 13-4712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMI ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YORK, COUNTY OF ADAMS, RICHARD K. RENN and others
Rose v. York County et al
as 1:2013cv02056
Plaintiff:
Jimi Rose
Defendant:
York County, Adams County, Richard K. Renn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
