Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00177
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly and Collins Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00313
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Awala v. International Court of Justice et al
as 1:2008cv00400
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
International Court of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Awala et al v. Wood et al
as 1:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala, Moses H. Awala and Dorcas C. Brown
Defendant:
Kimba M. Wood, Michael B. Mukasey, Rosemary S. Pooler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Awala v. Hardiman et al
as 1:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Awala
Defendant:
Hardiman, Chagares, McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jan F. Becker
Defendant:
Hudson, G.W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
