Cases 1 - 10 of 518
DIARRA v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv04733
Plaintiff:
MOUSSA U'NFA DIARRA
Defendant:
ROBERT LEONARD, GREGORY ADAM, DANIEL M. COURSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Borden et al
as 3:2024cv01085
Defendant:
Randall Hinkle, Sean Borden, Lionel Pierre and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollum v. Briggs et al
as 1:2024cv01305
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden Gregory Briggs
Petitioner:
Johnnie McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: YEAKEL
as 2:2024cv03725
Plaintiff:
GREGORY YEAKEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FANN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. FANN, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr LAUREL R. HARRY, WILLIAM LOWDEN, ERIC ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Briggz et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Dupree Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Briggz, C.O. Robinson, Savasia Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANDY v. NORDO et al
as 2:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HANDY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE PHILIP NORDO, DETECTIVE OHMARR JENKINS, DETECTIVE GREGORY SINGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Briggs et al
as 4:2024cv00648
Petitioner:
Andre Brown
Respondent:
Gregory Briggs and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOMACK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WOMACK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, JOSEPH WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
