Cases 111 - 120 of 536
Drew Zoldak v. Borough of Plum, et al
as 19-1443
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER JOSEPH LITTLE, BOROUGH OF PLUM, JEFF ARMSTRONG, Chief of Plum Borough Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DREW ZOLDAK
ALLEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DREW RICE, MICHAEL REPICI, JOSEPH MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
BAKEER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. HUDSON COUNTY PROTECTIVE SERVICES/ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES et al
as 2:2019cv00507
Defendant:
HUSDON COUNTY PROTECTIVE SERVICES/ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, FRANK R. GIOIA, ESQ., JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
SELMA FLORENCE MILLER and BENJAMIN CRAIG MILLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bushansky v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Parshall v. National Commerce Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Defendant:
Stephen A. Sevigny, Temple W. Tutwiler, III, Thomas H. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
DREW v. WALTON et al
as 2:2018cv01452
Plaintiff:
AL-AKH AKHBAR and ANTOINE DREW
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ, C/O THOMASINA CONKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Q.M. v. STEVENSON et al
as 5:2018cv04986
Defendant:
TONYA EVANS, AARON WRIGHT, TRACY KAUFFMAN and others
Plaintiff:
Q.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.G. v. STEVENSON et al
as 5:2018cv04985
Defendant:
TONYA EVANS, TRACY KAUFFMAN, JASMINE TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
K.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.M. v. STEVENSON et al
as 5:2018cv05026
Defendant:
TONYA EVANS, JUSTIN WILLIAMS, TRACY KAUFFMAN and others
Plaintiff:
J.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
