Cases 121 - 130 of 400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv03458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROOKS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv03146
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS SAFETY SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TROY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02322
Defendant:
C/O KENNETH, GEO GROUP INC., JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Hall-Long et al
as 1:2019cv00957
Defendant:
Hon. Jeffrey W. Bullock, Lt. Gov. Bethany A. Hall-Long, Hon. Colleen K. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZEMPLE v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2019cv12746
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, REGISTER SCO SAUNDERS, BEVERLY HASTINGS and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. CORT
as 2:2019cv12716
Defendant:
DR. JAMES T. CORT
Plaintiff:
PORTIA SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BRITT v. GLOUCESTER CITY et al
as 1:2019cv12446
Plaintiff:
TERENCE LEE BRITT
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY and ROBERT SAUNDERS, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2019cv01010
Petitioner:
SHAWN SAUNDERS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT. BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Andre Saunders
as 19-1516
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRE SAUNDERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shamsidin Ali v. Governor of Delaware, et al
as 19-1169
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE, CONNECTIONS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS, AKA Shamsidin Ali
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
