Cases 151 - 160 of 200
Pragmatus Telecom LLC v United Parcel Service Inc.
as 1:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Pragmatus Telecom LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Marks v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02091
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Marks
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. v. MILIEN et al
as 2:2011cv06775
Plaintiff:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Defendant:
HERMAN MILIEN, ADELINE AMBOSE and THE ESTATE OF AUGUSTIN LUCKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
LVL Patent Group LLC v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00834
Plaintiff:
LVL Patent Group LLC
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, United Parcel Service Inc., DHL Express (USA) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
THE BUSINESS STORE, INC. v. MAIL BOXES ETC., INC. et al
as 3:2011cv03662
Plaintiff:
THE BUSINESS STORE, INC.
Defendant:
MAIL BOXES ETC., INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Counter_claimant:
MAIL BOXES ETC., INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Counter_defendant:
THE BUSINESS STORE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 177 v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 177
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
