Cases 11 - 20 of 611
BALOGH et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BALOGH, GEORGE BAUMAN, BRIDGET COLLINS and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Not Yet Classified:
APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KELSO v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
DARNELL L. KELSO
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JOHN HARING, JASON COSTANZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Godlewski v. Alvear Gonzalez, et al.
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Philip Godlewski
Defendant:
Eduardo Nicolas Alvear Gonzalez, Good Lion Films, L.L.C. and Good Lion TV, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND v. DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant:
DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC., EDWARD W STACK, NAVDEEP GUPTA and others
Callaghan v. Good et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Vivian Callaghan
Defendant:
Fred Good and Julie Good
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callaghan v. Good et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Vivian Maritza Callaghan
Defendant:
Fred A. Good and Julie E. Good
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Good et al v. Callaghan
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Fred A. Good and Julie E. Good
Defendant:
Vivian Callaghan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodford Eurasia Assets Ltd. et al v. Lottery.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Woodford Eurasia Assets Ltd., MC Holdings Group, LLC, ALD Holdings Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lottery.com, Inc., Matthew McGahan, Barney Battles and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
