Cases 11 - 20 of 95
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
as 2:2023cv05038
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC, RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SERRANO v. UPPERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv04482
Plaintiff:
NOEL SERRANO
Defendant:
NAYLAN UPPERMAN, RAISER-PA, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HENRY et al v. UBER et al
as 2:2023cv22053
Plaintiff:
CARLENE HENRY and EVERSON FRANCIS
Defendant:
UBER, DOUGLAS GREGG, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
STALLWORTH v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2023cv21333
Plaintiff:
TYSHAN STALLWORTH
Defendant:
LOIS MCHUGH, RAISER, LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BODDIE
as 2:2023cv03780
Plaintiff:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN BODDIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
SPICUZZA v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al
as 2:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
CINDY SPICUZZA
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,, RASIER, LLC and RASIER-PA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIVINCENZO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv16238
Plaintiff:
GIORGIO DIVINCENZO
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and CHARLES W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Kugmeh v. Uber Technologies
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kugmeh
Defendant:
Uber Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MATOS v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MATOS
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC, RASIER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
