Cases 21 - 30 of 38
USA v. Kalif Flander
as 15-1986
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KALIF FLANDERS, AKA Smoke Dog
SUBER-APONTE v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv01314
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA SUBER-APONTE
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, MARK FLANDERS, JAMES YOST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SUBER v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2014cv04680
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA SUBER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, MARK FLANDERS and JAMES YOST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05862
Plaintiff:
HENRY ADAMS , NORMA ALDRIDGE , ELIZABETH ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLANDERS v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLANDERS
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1332
SUBER v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN et al
as 2:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
SHANICQUA SUBER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, MARK FLANDERS and POTTSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLANDERS CORPORATION v. KENNEDY et al
as 2:2012cv06064
Plaintiff:
FLANDERS CORPORATION
Defendant:
MARK B. KENNEDY and HEATH M. KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FLANDERS v. DZUGAN et al
as 2:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L. FLANDERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRED DZUGAN and FORD CITY BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. GALLAGHER et al
as 2:2011cv04352
Plaintiff:
LEROY A. WILSON
Defendant:
JOHN GALLAGHER, REBECCA MOLYLESKI, STEVEN DICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER et al v. BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN BOROUGH HALL et al
as 2:2011cv01939
Plaintiff:
LESLIE HARPER , ALICIA DOWSTER and SHUAH LEVI
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN BOROUGH HALL , POTTSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT , MICHAEL J. MARKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
