Cases 21 - 30 of 39
WATFORD et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv33033
Plaintiff:
ROY A WATFORD , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CORDIAL v. ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2011cv01457
Plaintiff:
JASON D. CORDIAL
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CITY, FRANCO SYDNOR, MICHELLE CLARK and others
Cross_claimant:
HARRAH'S HOTEL AND CASINO
Cross_defendant:
MICHELLE CLARK, JOHN J. MOONEY, III, CHRISTINE M. PETERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATFORD v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 2:2011cv00319
Petitioner:
IRONE WATFORD
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATFORD v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
IRONE WATFORD
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and GREG BARTKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATFORD v. BALICKI
as 1:2010cv03650
Plaintiff:
KENNY WATFORD
Defendant:
ROBERT BALICKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATFORD v. MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2009cv06111
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS L. WATFORD
Defendant:
MILLVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATFORD v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2009cv05271
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MARVIN WATFORD
Defendant:
ROBERT BALICKI, ROBERT SCIORE, KENNETH LAMPKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATFORD v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77084
Plaintiff:
JACKIE V. WATFORD
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JUNKERT v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01647
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JUNKERT
Defendant:
H. LAPPIN, J. GRONDOLSKY, N. NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01649
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACKSON
Defendant:
H. LAPPIN, J. GRONDOLSKY, N. NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
