Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
RAMSAY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43786
Plaintiff: EARL W RAMSAY
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BREAZEALE v. US MARSHALL et al
as 2:2011cv02454
Plaintiff: BRIAN BREAZEALE
Defendant: US MARSHALL, JIM DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. GEIDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv06831
Plaintiff: JAMES GERALD HOLMES
Defendant: GEIDER , HITCHCOCK , RAMSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDFIRST BANK v. RAMSAY et al
as 2:2010cv04061
Plaintiff: MIDFIRST BANK
Defendant: MICHAEL RAMSAY and GAIL RAMSAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
MIDFIRST BANK v. RAMSAY et al
as 2:2010cv00038
Plaintiff: MIDFIRST BANK
Defendant: MICHAEL RAMSAY and GAIL RAMSAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
RAMSAY v. MIDFIRST BANK et al
as 2:2009cv03813
Plaintiff: MICHAEL RAMSAY
Defendant: MIDFIRST BANK, TEMPLE-INLAND MORTGAGE and HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
MIDFIRST BANK v. RAMSAY et al
as 2:2009cv03156
Plaintiff: MIDFIRST BANK
Defendant: MICHAEL RAMSAY and GAIL RAMSAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03793
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAMSAY v. WAGNER
as 2:2007cv04117
Plaintiff: RASFA RAMSAY
Defendant: GEORGE A. WAGNER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RAMSAY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68216
Plaintiff: FRANK RAMSAY and MARGARET RAMSAY
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A.C. & S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?