Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00935
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00938
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00937
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Connections et al
as 1:2016cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Connections, Maureen Gay-Johnson, C.D. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll Rand Company, Trane US Inc., Hopeman Brothers Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Riley Power Inc., FMC Corporation, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Daniels v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jamel Daniels
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, David Pierce, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen et al v. Cytec Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
Richard Andersen
Defendant:
Cytec Industries Inc., Chris A. Davis, Anthony G. Fernandes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lagarde v. Cytec Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00891
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Lagarde
Defendant:
Cytec Industries Inc. , Shane D. Fleming , William P. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
