Cases 31 - 40 of 45
CRONIN v. OAKES et al
as 2:2014cv02412
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. CRONIN
Defendant:
THOMAS G. OAKES, II and ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mellott v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
Beth A. Mellott
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MELLOTT v. PPL CORPORATION
as 5:2013cv01509
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE MELLOTT
Defendant:
PPL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC v. CONAIR CORPORATION
as 2:2012mc00250
Plaintiff:
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC
Defendant:
CONAIR CORPORATION
Objector:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: Objection
Mary Primrose v. Trent Mellott, et al
as 12-4037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY K. PRIMROSE
Defendant - Appellant:
TRENT MELLOTT and TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ALLEN
John Kliesh v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, et al
as 12-3955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant - Appellee:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON (USA) and ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT
Mary Primrose v. Trent Mellott, et al
as 12-3927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY K. PRIMROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
TRENT MELLOTT and TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ALLEN
KLIESH v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al
as 2:2012cv00548
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING , CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON U.S.A. and ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC v. TENACORE HOLDINGS, INC
as 2:2011cv01251
Plaintiff:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Defendant:
TENACORE HOLDINGS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
