Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2011cv01306
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
Lawler, S Walter, H Glorioso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Brown v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-2440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH STANLEY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Commissioner, PA DEPT CORR, RICHARD ELLERS, Bureau of Health and others
POLAND v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62261
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. POLAND
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Lawler et al
as 1:2010cv02586
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler , Fisher , Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-SHAMI et al v. AL-SHAMI
as 2:2010cv04538
Petitioner:
ANNA AL-SHAMI and POLAND
Respondent:
NABIL AL-SHAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Beard et al
as 4:2010cv01129
Plaintiff:
Keith Stanley Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Ph.D., Richard Ellers, Raymond Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLAND v. OFFICE OF VOC. REHABILITATION, HORIZON HOUSE INC./ EPA REG. 3
as 2:2010cv01645
Plaintiff:
C. POLAND, JR.
Defendant:
OFFICE OF VOC. REHABILITATION, HORIZON HOUSE INC./ EPA REG. 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POLAND v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2010cv00313
Petitioner:
WATSON POLAND
Respondent:
RAYMOND LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herder v. Biesh et al
as 1:2009cv02470
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Herder
Defendant:
Mr. Biesh, Lechner, Shoaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLAND v. AMERICAN MINT et al
as 2:2009cv04943
Plaintiff:
CHARLES POLAND, JR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN MINT, AMERICAN'S PUBLISHER'S SERV. and CAPITAL ONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
