Cases 31 - 40 of 16,026
AUSTIN v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60064
Plaintiff:
CARROLL AUSTIN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODS v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60120
Plaintiff:
DAVID WOODS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KETTELL v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60085
Plaintiff:
HENRY KETTELL
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLURE v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60058
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MCCLURE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SNOW v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60090
Plaintiff:
MEREDITH SNOW
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERORAZIO v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60060
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERORAZIO
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAYLOR v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60087
Plaintiff:
WILLARD NAYLOR
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TERRY v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60105
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL TERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROADNAX v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60078
Plaintiff:
WARREN BROADNAX
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARNER v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60140
Plaintiff:
WILMER T. GARNER
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
