Cases 41 - 50 of 698
Powell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Shavortis Powell, Emery Day, Jessica Knoke and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MAINS v. TANDEM DIABETES CARE, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
DONNA MAINS
Defendant:
TANDEM DIABETES CARE, INC. and JOHN DOES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Mains
as 2:2023cv02443
Plaintiff:
Donna Mains
Defendant:
Tanden Diabetes Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ASHWORTH v. EUROFINS DONOR & PRODUCT TESTING, INC., F/K/A EUROFINS VRL et al
as 5:2023cv01958
Defendant:
EUROFINS DONOR & PRODUCT TESTING, INC., EUROFINS VRL, AZIYO BIOLOGICS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ASHWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CABRERA v. NAZOR et al
as 2:2023cv02745
Plaintiff:
LOLITA CABRERA
Defendant:
BRYAN NAZOR, DOMINICK DECARLO, JOHN BARTNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MONTGOMERY v. MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC.
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. doing business as RIDDLE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Matthew Borden v. NGM Insurance Co
as 23-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW BORDEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NGM INSURANCE CO, DBA Main Street America Group
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
