Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 69
MILLER v. AMERICAN MAIL LINES et al
as 2:2010cv37948
Plaintiff: CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: AMERICAN MAIL LINES , AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION , AMERICAN TRADING TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant: NATIONAL GYPSUM CO , KEENE CORP , AC AND S, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
NILSSON v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv37976
Thirdparty_plaintiff: JONS R. NILSSON
Defendant: AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED , KEYSTONE SHIPPING CO , KEYSTONE TANKSHIP CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WILLIAMS v. AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37845
Plaintiff: ISAIAH R. WILLIAMS
Defendant: AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION , CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP , COAST AND GEDDRTIC SURVEY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: UNITED BRANDS COMPANY , MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, INCORPORATED , CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant: ACANDS, INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, BABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VILLAMOR v. AMERCARGO, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv37942
Plaintiff: FELIX VILLAMOR
Defendant: AMERCARGO, INCORPORATED, ALASKA PACKERS, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WILSON et al v. ALGONQUIN STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37946
Plaintiff: MELVIN W. WILSON , WILLARD E BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant: ALGONQUIN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, AMERICAN OIL COMPANY, CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant: NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY , KEENE CORP , AC AND S, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WILLETS et al v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN et al
as 2:2010cv37964
Plaintiff: FRANK V. WILLETS , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED, CALMAR LINES and others
Movant: CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CLAYBOURNE v. AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37800
Plaintiff: CEASAR CLAYBOURNE
Defendant: AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION , BLIDBERG ROTHCHILD AGENCY CORPORATION, CEFOR CARGO AND SHIPS, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , GAF CORP , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
FOX v. AMERICAN MAIL LINES et al
as 2:2010cv37801
Plaintiff: JOHN J. FOX
Defendant: AMERICAN MAIL LINES , AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION , CALMAR LINES and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant: EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, HILLCONE STEAMSHIP CO., SAN DIEGO TUG BOAT TANKER and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. ALBATROSS STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37874
Plaintiff: WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: ALBATROSS STEAMSHIP COMPANY, AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION , CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC , AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION, CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP and others
Thirdparty_defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , KEENE CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC and others
Cross_claimant: TEXACO INC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JOSEPH v. AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37871
Plaintiff: WILFORD JOSEPH
Defendant: AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY , HUDSON WATERWAYS CORPORATION, LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: TEXACO INC and AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant: EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO and others
Cross_claimant: AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?