Cases 61 - 70 of 210
MOTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT, DORINE VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
MYRON MOTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beard et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01801
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Beard and Debra Beard
Defendant:
UPS Ground Freight, Inc., UPS Freight and Norfolk Southern Railway Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UPS FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2018cv01198
Plaintiff:
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UPS FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLAN
Defendant:
RICK WOLF and PATRICIA WOLF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ROY v. UPS STORE et al
as 1:2018cv12777
Plaintiff:
FRANK ROY
Defendant:
UPS STORE and LORI ANN ZEMORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAWNEE TRUCKING CO., INC v. UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC. , et al.
as 2:2018cv11536
Plaintiff:
SHAWNEE TRUCKING CO., INC
Defendant:
UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROY v. UPS STORE et al
as 1:2018cv11802
Plaintiff:
FRANK ROY
Defendant:
UPS STORE and LORI ANN ZEMORA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv01304
Defendant:
Deputy Mazukiewiez, Lieutenant Supervised Cell Extraction Team Unit, Dorine Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Moton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. ROKU KARAOKE et al
as 2:2018cv08633
Plaintiff:
BEOM SU LEE
Defendant:
ROKU KARAOKE, NAGASOO KARAOKE, RODEO KARAOKE and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. v. UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC.
as 2:2018cv08218
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA.
Defendant:
UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
