Cases 61 - 70 of 247
Vaughn v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Petitioner:
Ronnie Vaughn
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, C Maiorana, The Chair of the Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CURTIS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2016cv00099
Petitioner:
VAUGHN J. CURTIS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VAUGHN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02054
Plaintiff:
KEMO VAUGHN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SAYERS et al v. HAUSFELD, LLP et al
as 2:2016cv02005
Defendant:
HAUSFELD, LLP, LOCKS LAW FIRM, LLC, ZIMMERMAN REED LLP and others
Plaintiff:
SAYERS, ERIC HIPPLE, JERRY RUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01089
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN and JASON SWIDERSKI
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, JOHN A. BROWN, MARGARET FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Maiorana
as 1:2016cv00181
Petitioner:
Ronnie Vaughn
Respondent:
C. Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04629
Plaintiff:
RALPH VAUGHN
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SKOROCHOD et al
as 5:2015cv04365
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KAREN SKOROCHOD, ANTHONY SKOROCHOD, TOWN OF PLAINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
STOUFFER v. THE CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2015cv03523
Plaintiff:
HARRY STOUFFER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF READING, VAUGHN SPENCER, BRIAN NICARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
