Cases 71 - 80 of 186
SCHMIDT et al v. BARRON
as 2:2016cv04657
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCHMIDT and JULIE SCHMIDT
Defendant:
KEVIN P. BARRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Gambino v. Bobby Meeks, et al
as 16-3394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. GAMBINO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY L. MEEKS, Warden, H. BARRON, VAN HORN, Health Administrator and others
CORRADI v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2016cv05076
Plaintiff:
LOUIS CORRADI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, CENTRAL RECEPTION AND ASSIGNMENT FACILITY, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Barron Walker
as 16-2354
Petitioner:
In re: BARRON WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walker v. USA
as 1:2016cv00816
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Barron Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles Slaughter, et al v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 16-1121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON, DANIEL STRYKER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, Governor, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, President of NJ Senate, VINCENT PRIETO, Speaker of NJ Assembly and others
SLAUGHTER et al v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv08327
Plaintiff:
CHARLES S. SLAUGHTER, THOMAS LIDDELL, SHANE SIMPSON and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, STEPHEN SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe II v. The Pennsylvania State University et al
as 4:2015cv02108
Plaintiff:
John Doe II
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania State University , Eric Barron and Danny Shaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al
as 4:2015cv02072
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania State University , Eric Barron and Danny Shaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
