Cases 81 - 90 of 38,760
TODD et al v. WAL-MART et al
as 1:2024cv08615
Defendant:
WAL-MART, ABC CORPORATION 1-5, i/j/s/a and WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Plaintiff:
PAUL TODD, h/w and MARIE TODD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
LANG v. SCHOUPPE et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. SCHOUPPE and Beaver County d/b/a Beaver County Jail
Plaintiff:
Edward Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00200
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Zier v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01418
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Louis Zier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LYNCH v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mr. PETER J LYNCH
Defendant:
Atty Tanisha Bailey-Roka and Atty Kathryn Anne Donnelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MANNING v. PLATKIN
as 2:2024cv08795
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS MANNING
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv08573
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DEBRA J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v. NUNEZ et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Defendant:
LARRY SHAW, MARK BROTHERS, LESLIE BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DANE D. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KOLENDA v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00229
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ann Kolenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniels v. Brittain et al
as 3:2024cv01409
Petitioner:
Jerry Jeron Daniels
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Kathy J. Brittain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
