Cases 1 - 10 of 32
YAN v. FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv04734
Plaintiff:
YAN YAN
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY and FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACKLIN v. AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL
as 2:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
SYEED MACKLIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL doing business as FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KHARTCHENKO v. THE AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv23043
Plaintiff:
INNA KHARTCHENKO
Defendant:
THE AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL, INC., THE FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
YAN YAN v. REGENCY OF PENN STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2021cv03593
Plaintiff:
YAN YAN
Defendant:
REGENCY OF PENN STATE UNIVERSITY, TRUSTEE OF UNIVERSITY PENNSYLVANIA and FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PANCARI v. FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER et al
as 2:2020cv01844
Defendant:
FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER and FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
M.D. PHILIP PANCARI and PHILIP PANCARI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05820
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Patrina Edwards v. Fox Chase Cancer Center
as 19-3425
Defendant / Appellee:
FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRINA EDWARDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
