Cases 11 - 20 of 309
LaKemper v. Huneycutt et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Cobey LaKemper
Defendant:
Ronnie Huneycutt, Amy L. Jenkins, Joseph A. Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Barry et al
as 4:2023cv06159
Plaintiff:
Corey Anthony Stephens
Defendant:
Jennifer L. Barry, Amy Brock and Sheriff Sandra Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Biecker et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chris Biecker, FNU Miller, R. Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakha Yawuti El v. City of Myrtle Beach
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKHA YAWUTI EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GIOSA and others
Kelly v. Swan et al
as 1:2023cv02432
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelly
Defendant:
RN Burnice Swan, NP Janette Clark, RN Karen J. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
