Cases 11 - 20 of 251
Alphonza Thomas-Bey v. John Stine
as 23-6764
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS, III, a/k/a Alphonza L.P. Thomas-Bey
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN STINE
Roberts v. Holzapel
as 5:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Phillip Roberts
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard and W. Holzapel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Phillips v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv03203
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd v. United States Marshal
as 0:2023cv01595
Petitioner:
Phillip A. Byrd
Respondent:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garza v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00314
Petitioner:
Phillip A. Garza
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reeves v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2022cv04616
Petitioner:
Phillip C Reeves and Phillip Charles Reeves
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Director, Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Phillip Reeves v. Warden
as 22-7373
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP CHARLES REEVES
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Larry Mosley v. Phillip White
as 22-7351
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY D. MOSLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
PHILLIP A. WHITE, Warden
Kedzie v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02190
Petitioner:
Adam Phillips Kedzie
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Dunbar
as 5:2022cv03677
Petitioner:
Phillip Randolph Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
R S Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
