Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Adam v. Crawford et al
as 3:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Rakibu Adam
Defendant:
Jeffrey Crawford and Russell Hott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv04308
Respondent:
Warden Edgefield Correctional Institution and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Dwayne Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00319
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenyatta H. Adams
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Terry L. Adams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shields v. Warden of USP Lee County
as 7:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Sonny Adam Shields
Respondent:
Warden of USP Lee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adams v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Terry L. Adams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rakibu v. U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
as 3:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Adam Rakibu
Respondent:
U.S. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 8:2023cv06143
Petitioner:
Brandon Adams
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
