Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Shuck v. United States Marshals Service
as 5:2022hc02103
Petitioner:
Nicholas Shuck and Nicholas Brian Shuck
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RIDDICK v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE MDNC
as 1:2022cv00538
Petitioner:
JEREMY DEVON RIDDICK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE MDNC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Faulkner v. United States Marshal Services
as 1:2020cv00453
Respondent:
United States Marshal Services
Petitioner:
Alvin Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FAULKNER v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2019cv01096
Petitioner:
ALVIN FAULKNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NELSON-EL v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2018cv00959
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS NELSON-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Todd v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 6:2018cv00319
Petitioner:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service, Jeff Sessions, US Attorneys for the District of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge
as 17-7355
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES RATLEDGE, MARK HORNAK, DAVID HICTON and others
Evans v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2017cv00508
Petitioner:
Tiayon Kardell Evans
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Ratledge et al
as 5:2016hc02219
Petitioner:
Frederick Hamilton Banks
Respondent:
Charles Ratledge, Mark Hornack, David Hicton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
William H. Evans, Jr. v. United States Marshal Service
as 15-7788
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. EVANS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and WARDEN, Ross Correctional Institution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
