Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Russell Pickering v. Quicken Loans Incorporated
as 12-1714
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUSSELL T. PICKERING, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellant:
QUICKEN LOANS INCORPORATED, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, a/k/a MERS, Acting Solely as Nominee for Quicken Loans Inc and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICER LP, f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
Defendant:
DOES
Ratliff v. Consolidation Coal Company et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Defendant:
CNX Gas Company LLC, CONSOL Energy Inc., Consolidation Coal Company and others
Plaintiff:
Ira Gordon Ratliff
Interested Party:
Russell County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Pickering v. Quicken Loans Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02367
Plaintiff:
Russell T Pickering
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP and others
Counter_claimant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Quicken Loans Inc and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Counter_defendant:
Russell T Pickering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. USDA Forest Service et al
as 1:2011cv00152
Defendant:
USDA Forest Service , Terri Hope Dugas , Irene W. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Frank W. Phillips, Jr. , Vivien Phillips , Mitchell Lumber Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Terri Hope Dugas and Irene W. Cain
Counter_defendant:
Roger Ellis Ayers, Jr. , Ruffin Phillips Ayers , Mitchell Lumber Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSSELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00815
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M RUSSELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States of America v. Russell et al
as 7:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Linda S Russell and Arthur State Bank
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
