Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv05275
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Colvin Post Office
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Johnson v. Haza Foods LLC
as 6:2024cv05137
Defendant:
Haza Foods LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. CNY Regional Market Authority
as 2:2024cv00562
Defendant:
CNY Regional Market Authority
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Johnson v. South Carolina Department of Social Services
as 0:2024cv04731
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Carrols Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01548
Defendant:
Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King, 3G Capital and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. Simon et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Katherine Hord Simon, Tammy H. Hightower, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 1:2023cv02368
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, META, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 1:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robert Johnson v. Maria Imperial
as 22-1733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA L. IMPERIAL, GEICO CORPORATION, STEVEN L. MAURER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
