Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 91 - 100 of 10,883
Blevins v. Holzapel
as 5:2024cv00450
Petitioner: Jerry Blevins
Respondent: Warden Holzapel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mays v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Defendant: Major Fleeming, Sgt. Petticrew, Correctional Officer Savage and others
Plaintiff: Randall Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DiBiase v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00165
Petitioner: Paul DiBiase
Respondent: Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barrientos v. Assistent Attorney General al et.
as 5:2024cv00164
Respondent: Assistent Attorney General al et.
Petitioner: Jose Barrientos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00441
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Kali Eusi Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stewart v. FCI Beckley Warden
as 5:2024cv00440
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner: Dana Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00439
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00436
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Petitioner: Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barnwell v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00437
Petitioner: Terence Barnwell
Respondent: Mr. W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hollins v. US Attorney General et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Defendant: US Attorney General and FBOP
Petitioner: Kevin Dale Hollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?