Cases 41 - 50 of 30,981
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER
Respondent:
STEPHEN WADDELL, JOHN GRAY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Boyle et al
as 5:2024ct03219
Defendant:
Roy A. Cooper, III, Nancy S. Nash, Lexis Publishing and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. USA
as 3:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
Peter Augustus Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunter v. USA
as 3:2024cv00827
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lashana Latae Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CORSO v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00759
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Petitioner:
LELAND THOMAS CORSO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Defendant:
Jacob Staggs, Dakota Wolfe, Michael LovJoy and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Buffaloe
as 5:2024hc02160
Petitioner:
Herman S. Dawson
Respondent:
Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez Canela v. Warden FCI Butner Low
as 5:2024hc02161
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Alberto Hernandez Canela
Respondent:
Warden FCI Butner Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hurley v. Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03217
Plaintiff:
Adrien Tyrone Hurley
Defendant:
Department of Adult Correction and Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas Menchu-El v. Sommers
as 5:2024ct03218
Defendant:
Sergeant Sommers
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas Menchu-El, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
