Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Billy Asemani v. Lois Fisher
as 09-6097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
LOIS I. FISHER, Chief Attorney, NANCY SUSANNE FORSTER, Chief Public Defender and COLLATERAL REVIEW DIVISION OF THE OPD
Asemani v. Copes-Parker et al
as 1:2008cv03507
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
L. Copes-Parker, Fitchett, J. Cummons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Billy Asemani v. S. Smith
as 08-8579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
S. SMITH, Case Management Specialist, TYLER, Captain, Mailroom Supervisor, KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, ECI-East and others
Billy Asemani v. State of Maryland
as 08-8576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner and others
Party-in-Interest - Appellee:
STEPHANIE JUDITH LANE WEBER
Asemani v. Puller, et al
as 1:2008cv03397
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
Deborah Puller, Kathleen S. Green, J. Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Asemani v. Fisher et al
as 1:2008cv03272
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Defendant:
Lois I. Fisher, Nancy S. Forster and Collateral Review Division of the OPD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Asemani v. Smith et al
as 1:2008cv02952
Defendant:
S. Smith, Tyler, Kathleen S. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Billy G. Asemani
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Billy Asemani v. Kathleen Green
as 08-7467
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Respondent - Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND and KATHLEEN S. GREEN, ECI Warden
Asemani v. Green et al
as 1:2008cv01591
Petitioner:
Billy G. Asemani
Respondent:
Kathleen S. Green and The Attorney General for the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Billy Asemani v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-6431
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
