Cases 81 - 90 of 136,551
Murdock v. Gamewell et al
as 5:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
FNU Patel, FNU Chapman, FNU Gamewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Culbreath v. South Carolina Highway Patrol et al
as 8:2024cv05221
Plaintiff:
Jerome Culbreath
Defendant:
Dennis Kelly, South Carolina Highway Patrol and Greenwood County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Danville Police Department
as 7:2024cv00482
Defendant:
Danville Police Department
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisi v. Ong et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Defendant:
Blair Hudson and Officer C. R. Ong
Plaintiff:
Vincent Baisi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Maryland House of Correction-Jessup
as 1:2024cv02688
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Preston
Defendant:
Maryland House of Correction-Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Seabrooke v. Barnwell County Detention Center
as 6:2024cv05120
Defendant:
Barnwell County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
John Seabrooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dixon v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Respondent:
Mr. William Bailey and Mr. Brian Frosh
Petitioner:
Marquis Dionte Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Feick v. Sgt. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Feick
Defendant:
Gloria, Sgt. Smith, Bayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv04987
Defendant:
Prosecutor Clemons, Michael Robinson, Judge Michael Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Kendris Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mungin v. Fishburn et al
as 9:2024cv04121
Defendant:
Sergeant Josa Ragos and Sergeant Anthony Fishburn
Plaintiff:
Darryl Mungin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
