Cases 81 - 90 of 1,116
Young v. USA
as 3:2023cv03427
Petitioner:
Marcus Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Curry v. MacDougall Corr. Inst et al
as 0:2023cv03255
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
MacDougall Corr. Inst, Lee Correctional Institution, Ridgeland Corr. Inst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tyrone Young v. US
as 23-6660
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TYRONE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Carl A. Manis, J. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00388
Petitioner:
Kareem Al-Jamal Young
Respondent:
Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. Young et al
as 5:2023ct03191
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Owen Daniels
Defendant:
Rhonda Young and Young Law Office P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Little v. Young et al
as 0:2023cv02874
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Young and De'Angelo Fludd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Freeman v. Turner et al
as 5:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Quentin Freeman
Defendant:
FNU Turner, FNU Young, FNU Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Marshall, FNU Cox, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Marlo Young
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
