Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Frasier v. Daniel Pritchard
as 24-6744
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRASIER
Defendant:
NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT DANIEL PRITCHARD, North Charleston Police Department and STEVEN HALL, North Charleston Police Department
Frasier v. Pritchard et al
as 2:2023cv04163
Plaintiff:
Michael Frasier
Defendant:
Det. Pritchard, Officer Hall, North Charleston Police Department, S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moss v. Reed et al
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Defendant:
Stephanie Reed, Mary Jane Dolan, Ryan Zuidema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Zuidema et al
as 7:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Officer C.N. Harris, Officer Rippy, The City of Lynchburg and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mallwitz v. Mack et al
as 2:2020cv02220
Defendant:
Scarlet Wilson, Det D.J. Pritchard, Benjamin Andrew Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan B Mallwitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIOT v. DOJ et al
as 3:2018cv03164
Defendant:
IRENE JOSEY, Rodney Pritchard, SCARLET A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owen Harriot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Adams et al
as 2:2016cv03452
Plaintiff:
Jason Antonio West
Defendant:
Brian Adams, Johnathon Glenn, Daniel Pritchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Pritchard et al
as 1:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
FNU Pritchard and Mike Ball
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin Bey v. Pritchard et al
as 5:2015ct03152
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Officer Pritchard and Mike Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack-Bey v. Hicks et al
as 5:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dameon Mack-Bey
Defendant:
FNU Hicks, Kelly Pennell and FNU Pritchard
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
