Cases 1 - 10 of 1,503
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Defendant:
TERRY INGRAM, LACHELLE BULLARD, GARY HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatlin v. USA
as 7:2024cv00828
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Lynn Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ackbar v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv03919
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gary and Supreme Raheem Ackbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Christopher Rutledge v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine
as 24-6649
Defendant:
CAROL MILLIGAN, CHERYL BUSHMELL, JASON REID, Ex Deputy and others
Plaintiff:
A.D.R., A.M.R. and CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Cooper v. Warden
as 1:2024cv02242
Petitioner:
Gary Cooper
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Vaughter v. R. Vaughn
as 24-6724
Defendant:
T. ROWLEY, TARRA JOHNSON, Chief of Housing at SFCC, JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. VAUGHTER
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Defendant:
Dr. M. Clarke, Gary Jones, Lt. Adlan and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckham v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Respondent:
Gary L. McFadden, Mecklenburg County Jail Central, Ashley Nicole Robinson and others
Petitioner:
Dayshawn Beckham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cotton v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Cotton
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Boone v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6588
Defendant:
DR. FIGUEROA, Chief Psychologist Williamsburg FCI Individually and in official capacity, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, DR. LAXTON, Psychologist Williamsburg FCI individually and in official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
GARY DEAN BOONE, also known as Valerie Boone
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
