Cases 1 - 4 of 4
US v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 10-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Petitioner:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
TERENCE PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, GEORGE CHEMALI and CLP, INCORPORATED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Merrick Land, As Described in Deed Book 1744, Page 1095 of the Brunswick County Registry, North Carolina, and Having the Street Address of 320 Main Street, Navassa, North Carolina, and Being Titled in
as 7:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Merrick Land, As Described in Deed Book 1744, Page 1095 of the Brunswick County Registry, North Carolina, and Having the Street Address of 320 Main Street, Navassa, North Carolina, and Being Titled in
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Funds in the Account: Account No. 10-0047-9706, PNC Bank, 1 PNC Plaza, 259 5th Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222 et al
as 1:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Funds in the Account: Account No. 10-0047-9706, PNC Bank, 1 PNC Plaza, 259 5th Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15222, Funds in the Account: Account No.02-00036034, First Federal Savings and Loan Association, 1 West Main St., Uniontown PA, 15401, Funds in the Account: Policy No. 2VA00187585, MONY Life Insurance Company of America, 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
USA v. Certain real property and premises located at 511 East Main Street, Luray, Virginia, any and all proceeds from sale thereof
as 5:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Certain real property and premises located at 511 East Main Street, Luray, Virginia, any and all proceeds from sale thereof
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
