Cases 111 - 120 of 1,030
Bey v. Becker et al
as 4:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Bruce Riley Bey
Defendant:
Peter Beclar, Timothy Baxley, Marcia Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
David King v. Timothy Riley
as 22-6410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID T. KING, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Telly King
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN TIMOTHY RILEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN ANDREA THOMPSON, ASSOCIATE WARDEN GARY LANE and others
Hargett v. McMahon et al
as 5:2022ct03098
Plaintiff:
James Hargett and James Edward Hargett
Defendant:
Ed McMahon and Cpl. J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2022cv00876
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hargett v. New Hanover County Jail
as 5:2022ct03087
Plaintiff:
James Hargett
Defendant:
New Hanover County Jail, Ed McMahon and J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biro v. Chapman
as 1:2022cv00176
Petitioner:
Riley Biro
Respondent:
Mike Lee Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Salmon et al
as 7:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Riley M. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Joshua Salmon and Major Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Draper v. Innovative Fibers LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Riley C Draper
Defendant:
Innovative Fibers LLC and Stein Fibers LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. United States Bankruptcy Court et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Charles Riley
Defendant:
United States Bankruptcy Court, Hon. David R. Duncan, Bruce M. Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
