Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Carey-Powe v. WMATA
as 1:2019cv02157
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
Blyth Carey-Powe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Carey-Powe v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2019cv02157
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Blyth Carey-Powe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carey v. Maryland Natural Resources Police et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Norris Paul Carey, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Natural Resources Police , Joanne Throwe, Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carey v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017cv03427
Plaintiff:
Joanne N Carey
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alston et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 8:2017cv02938
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alston, Carey Vaughn, Tavaris Pittman and others
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , Seterus, Inc. and ServiceLink Field Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alston et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2017cv02938
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alston, Curtis Ross, Carey Vaughn and others
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Seterus, Inc. and ServiceLink Field Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
CX Reinsurance Company Limited v. Sugarman et al
as 1:2017cv02546
Plaintiff:
CX Reinsurance Company Limited
Defendant:
Stanley E. Sugarman, Homewood Realty, Inc. and Kyn-Yon Earl Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
