Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Simpson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Defendant:
Thomas B. Hoover, Melvin Todd, Jr., Joshua Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Willis et al
as 4:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison
Defendant:
Janie Deborah Willis, Sherry Ann Zamora, Timothy Martin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Willis et al
as 4:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison
Defendant:
Janie Deborah Willis, Sherry Ann Zamora, Timothy Martin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Circuit Court of City of Richmond et al
as 3:2017cv00470
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Defendant:
Circuit Court of City of Richmond, Nuckels S Bivinly, Holter Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minetree v. Bogley et al
as 1:2015cv01694
Plaintiff:
Sally Minetree
Defendant:
Hilleary Bogley, Lane Phillippe, Mary Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Phatisis v. Clark et al
as 3:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phatisis
Defendant:
Jason Clark , Tripp Haney and Brian Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phatisis v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00305
Plaintiff:
Melissa Phatisis
Defendant:
Jason Clark, Tripp Haney and Brian Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Fish Bones of Danville, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00025
Defendant:
Patricia Boyle and Fish Bones of Danville, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Harbeck v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Rachel Harbeck
Defendant:
Linda B. Smith and William Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braithwaite v. Hinkle et al
as 1:2009cv00879
Plaintiff:
Ocary Braithwaite
Defendant:
George M. Hinkle, Gerard F. Boyle, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
