Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Munday et al v. Beaufort County et al
as 9:2020cv02144
Plaintiff:
Margaret Devine and Cheryl A Munday
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Quandara Grant, Beaufort County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drum v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2019cv03529
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R Bard Inc, John Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Drum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01817
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R Bard Inc, Jane Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn T Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lumpkin v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01822
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R Bard Inc, John Doe 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Kareemah R Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hendricks v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01815
Plaintiff:
Penny A Hendricks
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R Bard Inc, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHORT v. HARTMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00741
Defendant:
Crystal Cook Meadows, John or Jane Does 1-5, Matthew Travis Boger and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J Message Group Corp. v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2018cv00399
Plaintiff:
J Message Group Corp.
Defendant:
Carol Hubbard and John & Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Polidi v. North Carolina State Bar et al
as 1:2016cv01322
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
North Carolina State Bar, John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Bernard et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. See 7:16-cv-257-BO.
as 4:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
Antoine L Graham
Defendant:
Anthony J Bernard , James A Maroldt, Michael A Fike and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
