Cases 11 - 20 of 12,213
Thomas Bajorek v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04976
Defendant:
Amerex Corporation, BASF Corporation, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bajorek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Humphrey v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv04900
Plaintiff:
Thomas Humphrey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Thomas v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00181
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Petitioner:
Charles Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas Rhoden v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv04869
Defendant:
Chemguard, Inc., 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rhoden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guinn v. Crawley et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Defendant:
Smith, Giles, Randoo and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas McClain Guinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Davis et al
as 5:2024ct03207
Defendant:
Officer Davis, Cherie Oxendine and Lt. Pate
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Moates
as 6:2024cv04779
Plaintiff:
Thomas Capell
Defendant:
Andrew R Moates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Matthews v. Senior Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01550
Defendant:
Senior Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthews
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Reaves et al v. Kozacki et al
as 4:2024cv04748
Defendant:
Wilcox, Buyck & Williams, P.A., South Carolina Law Enforcement, Jerome Scott Kozacki and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Reaves and Siobhan Reaves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02519
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
