Cases 21 - 30 of 24,856
Hunt v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00511
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richardson v. Baker et al
as 5:2024cv00537
Defendant:
On Point Risk Solutions, Thomas L. Teal, Adam B. Midgette and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loren et al v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03225
Plaintiff:
Webster R. Neumann, Bobby Reece, Roger W. Clark and others
Defendant:
Haley Phillips, Darren Jackson, Graham Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Fox et al
as 9:2024cv05138
Respondent:
Marcus Rhods, George Debusk Jr., William Rudderow and others
Petitioner:
Billly L. Alford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Harris v. Chapman
as 3:2024cv00660
Respondent:
Tonya D. Chapman
Petitioner:
Samuel L. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
John L. Hunter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Howard v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00862
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff:
John L. Howard
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Murphy v. Barron et al
as 1:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Ruth Shuman, Erek L. Barron, Megan L. Micco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
