Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 11,532
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01699
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01700
Defendant: John Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01701
Defendant: John Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01702
Defendant: John Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01703
Defendant: John Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hamm v. State of South Carolina et al
as 9:2024cv05283
Defendant: Jane and John Doe Psychologist, Jane and John Doe Psychiatrist, Eric Lawrenze and others
Plaintiff: Michael E. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Emden v. University of Baltimore School of Law et al
as 1:2024cv02744
Defendant: John Doe 3, John Doe 1, University of Baltimore School of Law and others
Plaintiff: Jonathan Emden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 c-6ed Discrimination in Education
Rosario v. Marbrey et al
as 5:2024ct03229
Defendant: J.S. Marbrey, R. Cardoza, John Doe 1-12 and others
Plaintiff: Luis Rosario and Luis Rafael Garcia Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newberry v. Prodan et al
as 1:2024cv04178
Defendant: Michael J. Prodan, Dustin Dailey and John Doe
Plaintiff: Flip and Phillip D. Newberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?