Cases 41 - 50 of 289
Sacra v. Haga et al
as 7:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Sacra, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Austin H. Haga, Sgt. Marc E. I. Bilbrey, C/O Jeffrey S. Bemis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Antonio Simmons
as 22-4123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO SIMMONS, a/k/a Murdock, a/k/a Doc
Joe Baltas v. Rollin Cook
as 22-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, In His Individual and Official Capacities -a Connecticut DOC employee
Williams v. Kelly et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Warden Kelly, James Savge, Doc Deezien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Khalil Kimbrough v. Kevin Hudson
as 21-7713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIL J. KIMBROUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN HUDSON, Superintendent, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of DOC, NURSE MEADE, Director of the Medical Staff and others
Kephart v. VA DOC
as 7:2021cv00612
Petitioner:
Philip Edward Kephart, Jr.
Respondent:
VA DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amore v. Ridgely et al
as 3:2021cv00158
In Re:
Doc's Truck Center, LLC
Plaintiff:
Aaron C. Amore
Defendant:
Shirley Brannon Ridgely and Harry Ridgely
Al-Mutawakkil v. Andrews et al
as 3:2021cv00387
Defendant:
Eracka Young, J. Andrews, B.O.P. Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Hanif K. Al-Mutawakkil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
