Cases 41 - 50 of 197
Smith v. Pauley et al
as 7:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
Elbert Smith
Defendant:
Sergeant Michael Pauley, Correctional Officer S. Smith, Correctional Officer Cuykindall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Virgina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00919
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
Virgina Department of Corrections, Virgina Department of Corrections Board, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elam v. Kilolo
as 2:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
Eric Ricardo Elam
Defendant:
Commissioner Kijakazi Kilolo and Kijakazi Kilolo
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Adam Pelletier v. Marcus Elam
as 21-7043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM PELLETIER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator, BETH CABEL, Warden Sussex II and MR. BROWN, Hearing Officer for Sussex II
William Thorpe v. Harold Clarke
as 21-1714
Defendant / Appellant:
H. S. RICHESON, TORI RAIFORD, HAROLD CLARKE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN RIDDICK, GARY WALL, KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR. and others
Defendant:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Thomas v. Broth et al
as 2:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Mack Baillt, C.M. Ragadale, Ms. A. Robin and others
Plaintiff:
Dave Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raiford v. Clarke et al
as 1:2021cv00734
Defendant:
M Foster, Russ, Jamie and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Raiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Mosley
as 21-6670
Defendant / Appellee:
GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR MOSLEY, SERGEANT DIAL, MS. DARBY, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
