Cases 41 - 50 of 1,554
Long v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Edward Long
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Flor Arriaza De Paredes v. Zen Nails Studio LLC
as 23-2309
Plaintiff:
FLOR I. ARRIAZA DE PAREDES and FRANCISCO HERNAN TEJADA LOPEZ
Defendant:
ZEN NAILS STUDIO LLC, PHONZ NGUYEN, a/k/a Dung Nen Chay Khach and LINH NGUYEN, a/k/a Nen Giu Khach Hai Long
Jorge Long v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06878
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
FREELAND v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREELAND
Defendant:
LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-302
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Petitioner:
ACCENTURE LLP
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
In re: Marriott International, Inc.
as 23-299
Petitioner:
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
PETER MALDINI, ROGER CULLEN, PAULA O'BRIEN and others
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
